<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ueckerman.net</title>
	<link>http://ueckerman.net</link>
	<description>The Good, the bad and the ugly</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Contrasting Python and Ruby by Daniel</title>
		<link>http://ueckerman.net/2007/05/03/contrasting-python-and-ruby/#comment-75</link>
		<author>Daniel</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ueckerman.net/2007/05/03/contrasting-python-and-ruby/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>I concur with Adrian. Many of Python's so-called "cons",are in my opinion, pros.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur with Adrian. Many of Python&#8217;s so-called &#8220;cons&#8221;,are in my opinion, pros.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Contrasting Python and Ruby by Joe</title>
		<link>http://ueckerman.net/2007/05/03/contrasting-python-and-ruby/#comment-74</link>
		<author>Joe</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ueckerman.net/2007/05/03/contrasting-python-and-ruby/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Some interesting comments above.  I just have one more to add.  You ask "Is 'from datetime import datetime' DRY?"

Well, yes it is.  The first 'datetime' is the name of the module, the second is a datetime within that module.  You haven't repeated yourself, because you've referred to two different things.  It's a slightly odd naming convention that's been chose, but hardly a con of the language as a whole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some interesting comments above.  I just have one more to add.  You ask &#8220;Is &#8216;from datetime import datetime&#8217; DRY?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, yes it is.  The first &#8216;datetime&#8217; is the name of the module, the second is a datetime within that module.  You haven&#8217;t repeated yourself, because you&#8217;ve referred to two different things.  It&#8217;s a slightly odd naming convention that&#8217;s been chose, but hardly a con of the language as a whole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Basics of REST in Rails by Ruby On Rails - important BookMarks</title>
		<link>http://ueckerman.net/2007/04/24/the-basics-of-rest-in-rails/#comment-70</link>
		<author>Ruby On Rails - important BookMarks</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 06:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ueckerman.net/2007/04/24/the-basics-of-rest-in-rails/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>[...] The Basics of REST in Rails [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The Basics of REST in Rails [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
